ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE: A CONCISE REVIEW

Authors

  • Chettla.Sravani Priyadarshini Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 5th Mile, Pulladigunta, Guntur-522017, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Keywords:

Adverse drug reaction, machine learning, artificial intelligence, pharmacovigilance, regulatory integration, signal detection

Abstract

The rapid expansion of drug safety data from clinical trials, spontaneous reporting systems, electronic health records, literature, and social media has placed significant strain on traditional pharmacovigilance systems. The analyzed articles collectively highlight the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing these challenges and enhancing drug safety monitoring. AI techniques such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing have demonstrated substantial improvements in adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection, signal identification, case processing, and literature screening. Compared with conventional methods, AI-driven systems enable earlier signal detection, reduced false positives, faster case triage, and improved data accuracy. Several studies report notable reductions in case processing time and increased sensitivity in detecting safety signals, supporting more proactive pharmacovigilance practices. Despite these advantages, the articles also identify key limitations, including data quality issues, lack of model transparency, regulatory uncertainty, ethical concerns, and the need for skilled human oversight. Integration challenges related to infrastructure, validation, and global regulatory harmonization remain critical barriers to widespread adoption. Overall, the findings suggest that AI, when implemented within robust regulatory and ethical frameworks, can significantly strengthen pharmacovigilance systems. The convergence of human expertise and AI technologies holds strong potential to improve patient safety, optimize regulatory decision-making, and advance the future of drug safety surveillance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Olsson S. The role of the WHO Programme on International Drug Monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts. Drug Saf. 1998;19(1):1-10. doi:10.2165/00002018-199819010-00001.

2. Linder JA, Haas JS, Iyer A, Labuzetta MA, Ibara M, Celeste M, et al. Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(12):1211-1215. doi:10.1002/pds.2027.

3. Rao C. Evaluation of antiulcer activity of Picrasma quassioides Bennett aqueous extract in rodents. Vedic Res Int Phytomedicine. 2013.

4. Sharrar RG, Dieck GS. Monitoring product safety in the postmarketing environment. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2013;4(5):211-219. doi:10.1177/2042098613490780.

5. Aronson JK. Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: an introduction to terms, concepts, applications, and limitations. Drug Saf. 2022;45(5):407-418. doi:10.1007/s40264-022-01156-5.

6. Gindi S, Methra T, Chandu BR, Boyina R, Dasari V. Antiurolithiatic and in vitro antioxidant activity of leaves of Ageratum conyzoides in rat. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;2:636-649.

7. Hauben M, Hartford CG. Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: scoping points to consider. Clin Ther. 2021;43(2):372-379. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.014.

8. Salas M, Petracek J, Yalamanchili P, Aimer O, Kasthuril D, Dhingra S, et al. The use of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a systematic review of the literature. Pharm Med. 2022;36(5):295-306. doi:10.1007/s40290-022-00441-z.

9. Nama S, Chandu BR, Awen BZ, Khagga M. Development and validation of a new RP-HPLC method for the determination of aprepitant in solid dosage forms. Trop J Pharm Res. 2011;10(4):489-495.

10. Fusaroli M, Isgrò V, Cutroneo PM, Ferrajolo C, Cirillo V, Del Bufalo F, et al. Post-marketing surveillance of CAR-T-cell therapies: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Drug Saf. 2022;45(8):891-908. doi:10.1007/s40264-022-01194-z.

11. Lindquist M. VigiBase, the WHO global ICSR database system: basic facts. Drug Inf J. 2008;42(5):409-419. doi:10.1177/009286150804200501.

12. Lavertu A, Vora B, Giacomini KM, Altman R, Rensi S. A new era in pharmacovigilance: toward real-world data and digital monitoring. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109(5):1197-1202.

13. Bate A, Evans SJ. Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):427-436.

14. Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(Suppl 1). doi:10.4103/0976-500X.120957.

15. Degapati RT. Novel approaches in transdermal drug delivery system. J Multidiscip Res. 2025;20-25.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

[1]
Chettla, S. 2026. ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE: A CONCISE REVIEW . Journal of Drug Reactions. 2, 1 (Jun. 2026), 19–24.

Issue

Section

Articles